Welcome to the TeamstersOnline.com.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15
  1. #1
    Scab Hating Union Thug

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Local Union
    222
    Employer
    YRC
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    27,838
    Rep Power
    1175

    Default Trade agreements "unpacked"

    A very interesting read. There are many different articles to read as you scroll down.

    Economist's View: International Trade

  2. #2
    bean
    Guest

    Default Re: Trade agreements "unpacked"

    https://www.commerce.gov/news/press-...lion-jobs-2014
    U.S. Exports Support a Record 11.7 Million Jobs in 2014.
    1. An Estimated 12 Million U.S. Jobs Depend On ... | Chegg.com

    It depends on what you believe. A good trade pact creates more jobs then it loses.

  3. #3
    Scab Hating Union Thug

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Local Union
    222
    Employer
    YRC
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    27,838
    Rep Power
    1175

    Default Re: Trade agreements "unpacked"

    Quote Originally Posted by bean View Post
    https://www.commerce.gov/news/press-...lion-jobs-2014


    1. An Estimated 12 Million U.S. Jobs Depend On ... | Chegg.com

    It depends on what you believe. A good trade pact creates more jobs then it loses.
    Bullsh*t. Our union doesn't think so. Why do you?
    Last edited by crazy; 03-21-2016 at 08:13 AM.

  4. Likes ABFwife Liked this post
  5. #4
    bean
    Guest

    Default Re: Trade agreements "unpacked"

    Quote Originally Posted by 222lifer View Post
    :(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(. Our union doesn't think so. Why do you?
    Oh but the union was in favor of the pipeline but you were not. So if 12 million jobs are related to exports but 2 million jobs were lost because of imports you would, given your history of job squashing you still would shut the 10 million job gain down for environmental reasons right?

  6. #5
    Scab Hating Union Thug

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Local Union
    222
    Employer
    YRC
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    27,838
    Rep Power
    1175

    Default Re: Trade agreements "unpacked"

    Quote Originally Posted by bean View Post
    Oh but the union was in favor of the pipeline but you were not. So if 12 million jobs are related to exports but 2 million jobs were lost because of imports you would, given your history of job squashing you still would shut the 10 million job gain down for environmental reasons right?
    You're stuttering bro. Still perpetuating the lie? I shoved that up your wise azz already in another thread. Remember rubbing ointment on the orifice that hurt the worst? Surely you must. I spoke of the discussion at my local. Needing the jobs and being prudent. I gave a solution to the problem awhile later on these boards. Simple logistics. Move it to the east of the aquifers. That would sure stop the griping on tainting the water supply. I spoke of adding miles and jobs on the spread, not squashing them like you claim. But the pipeline is something entirely different than this. No environmental concerns. A different subject all together. Imagine that? Another trip down the beanhole.






    Sent from my SGH-T399 using Tapatalk

  7. #6
    bean
    Guest

    Default Re: Trade agreements "unpacked"

    Quote Originally Posted by 222lifer View Post
    You're stuttering bro. Still perpetuating the lie? I shoved that up your wise azz already in another thread. Remember rubbing ointment on the orifice that hurt the worst? Surely you must. I spoke of the discussion at my local. Needing the jobs and being prudent. I gave a solution to the problem awhile later on these boards. Simple logistics. Move it to the east of the aquifers. That would sure stop the griping on tainting the water supply. I spoke of adding miles and jobs on the spread, not squashing them like you claim. But the pipeline is something entirely different than this. No environmental concerns. A different subject all together. Imagine that? Another trip down the beanhole.
    Sent from my SGH-T399 using Tapatalk
    Enviro concerns are about Obama's political bs. Teamster concerns or any union's concern and priority is about jobs. Period

  8. #7
    Scab Hating Union Thug

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Local Union
    222
    Employer
    YRC
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    27,838
    Rep Power
    1175

    Default Re: Trade agreements "unpacked"

    Quote Originally Posted by bean View Post
    Enviro concerns are about Obama's political bs. Teamster concerns or any union's concern and priority is about jobs. Period
    Really bean? It seems they are concerned about jobs. Jobs that are leaving the country along with the union membership. Those "jobs associated to trade" you speak of don't all carry a union card. Do you need someone to connect the dots for you on the declining memberships and pension troubles? Keep lobbying for the free traders that send our jobs out of the country bean. You got yours though.

    Sent from my SGH-T399 using Tapatalk

  9. Likes crazy Liked this post
  10. #8
    bean
    Guest

    Default Re: Trade agreements "unpacked"

    Quote Originally Posted by 222lifer View Post
    Really bean? It seems they are concerned about jobs. Jobs that are leaving the country along with the union membership. Those "jobs associated to trade" you speak of don't all carry a union card. Do you need someone to connect the dots for you on the declining memberships and pension troubles? Keep lobbying for the free traders that send our jobs out of the country bean. You got yours though.

    Sent from my SGH-T399 using Tapatalk
    good spin

  11. #9
    Scab Hating Union Thug

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Local Union
    222
    Employer
    YRC
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    27,838
    Rep Power
    1175

    Default Re: Trade agreements "unpacked"

    Quote Originally Posted by bean View Post
    good spin
    You mad bro? You must have something against union rail workers too? You are consistent. You piss on them all.

    Sent from my SGH-T399 using Tapatalk

  12. Likes fxstc07, crazy Liked this post
  13. #10
    Retired !

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Local Union
    107
    Employer
    Retired - New Penn
    Location
    South Jersey
    Posts
    17,479
    Rep Power
    376

    Default Re: Trade agreements "unpacked"

    Quote Originally Posted by 222lifer View Post
    You mad bro? You must have something against union rail workers too? You are consistent. You piss on them all.
    Hit the nail there !

 

 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •