December 1, 2020 Updated: December 2, 2020
FacebookTweetParlerEmail
376 Shares
73 Comments
The Republican plaintiffs who are challenging legislation that allowed mail-in ballots from all comers in Pennsylvania, today filed a request to the Supreme Court to block the state from certifying the election.
The state Supreme Court had dismissed the case on Nov. 28, overturning a temporary block on election certification issued by a lower court.
Challenging that ruling, the emergency application for injunction, dated Dec. 1, asks the Supreme Court to prohibit the Pennsylvania governor and secretary of state from “taking official action to tabulate, compute, canvass, certify, or otherwise finalize the results of the election.”
“To the extent that the above-prohibited actions have already taken place, petitioners seek an injunction to restore the status quo ante, compelling respondents to nullify any such actions already taken, until further order of this court,” says the petition.
The emergency application essentially asks the court to put a temporary hold on certifying the state election pending the filing of a full writ of certiorari—asking the court to review the lower court decisions.
Re: The path to challenging "systemic voter fraud" during the 2020 presidential elect
Maybe these people should be should go under oath and explain exactly what they were doing that night in the counting room..
BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Third Suspect from State Farm Center ‘Suitcase Scandal’ Identified as Ralph Jones, Sr. – Who Was in the News for Shady Deal with ATL Mayor Keisha Bottoms
On election night we were told that voting stopped in Georgia’s State Farm Arena due to a water main break. President Trump was way ahead in the election at that time. But a couple days later we uncovered that the water main break never happened. First an attorney in the Atlanta area asked for information related to the event via an freedom of information request and he shared with us that the only item he received was a couple of text messages related to the event:
A significant portion of Americans believe it is “likely” that Democrats stole votes or destroyed ballots intended for President Donald Trump to “ensure that [former Vice President Joe] Biden would win,” a Rasmussen Reports survey released Monday found.
Rasmussen Reports conducted the survey December 3-6, 2020, among 1,000 likely voters and asked respondents, “How likely is it that Democrats stole votes or destroyed pro-Trump ballots in several states to ensure that Biden would win?”
They were virtually split, with 49 percent saying it is either “not very” or “not at all” likely. However, 47 percent expressed the belief that it was “very” or “somewhat” likely. The two groups are within the +/- 3 percent margin of error, indicating a statistical tie. Four percent remain unsure.
Three-quarters of Republicans believe it is likely that Democrats either stole votes or destroyed Trump ballots to assist Biden, compared to 25 percent of Democrats who feel the same way.
Voters were also asked about mail-in voting, with 57 percent saying it worked “for the most part.” However, over one-third, or 39 percent, said mass mail-in voting led to “unprecedented voter fraud in this election.”
The beliefs are sharply divided on partisan lines, with 30 percent of Republicans saying mail-in voting “worked well for the most part” and 85 percent of Democrats agreeing. In contrast, 67 percent of Republicans say it led to unprecedented fraud, compared to the 13 percent of Democrats who said the same.
While the survey found that a majority, or 60 percent, believe Trump should concede the election to Biden based on current knowledge, 34 percent disagree, and 6 percent remain unsure.
However, a majority of Republicans, 61 percent, said Trump should not yet concede, compared to the 86 percent of Democrats who believe he should.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s lawsuit filed with the U.S. Supreme Court is the “be-all, end-all case” for President Donald Trump’s ongoing and long-running election challenge, Trump lawyer Jordan Sekulow said Tuesday on Newsmax TV.
“The Supreme Court is not just considering what Texas has filed [Tuesday], they are now going the next step, which is to say, ‘We want a response from the states named,'” Sekulow told Tuesday’s “Stinchfield,” referring to four battleground states Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin.
Comment