Biden roars back: Super Tuesday

[crazy]

Re: Biden roars back: Super Tuesday

George Washington. No bone spurs in his history. Do we speak the King's English or American English?

By the way, President Washington didn't have the benefit of a predecessor who's legacy could be rescinded and claimed as an accomplishment. It's all about quality accomplishments not quantity. Quality is a word that seldom collides in a sentence with our Sharpie wielding Apprentice Prez. But alas, all that is better suited for another thread.

I wonder what Ol' Joe has in his sights as great accomplishments? Reinstating every careless swipe of a pen from his predecessor?

Sent from my SM-J327T using Tapatalk

I see you had to go back over 200 years for your example. Maybe you could list of few of Washington's accomplishments.

And Sleepy Joe more than likely will never get his chance . Might better come up with a new candidate..

[Sayheykid]

Re: Biden roars back: Super Tuesday

show me a president that has done more than trump in his first three years..

'fdr"

[222lifer]

Re: Biden roars back: Super Tuesday

I see you had to go back over 200 years for your example. Maybe you could list of few of Washington's accomplishments.

And Sleepy Joe more than likely will never get his chance . Might better come up with a new candidate..

History lessons can be quite entertaining. You were given one example in my previous post. Keep in mind that America isn't "The land of the free and the home of the bonespurs."

You seem to believe Ol' Joe will never get his chance. That can only be attributed to elections where "a little help from my friends" determines the outcome.

[Sayheykid]

Re: Biden roars back: Super Tuesday

Yeah okay you can say the Republicans are not the party for labor. But you can also say The same for the Democrats .. Sure they talk big but hardly do they deliver. Bernie doesn't have a chance. The establishment does not want him. Almost 60 % of the people in this country do not want socialism...Bernie burried himself when he was praising some of the programs in Cuba. Socialism is not the answer for this country. It hasn't worked anywhere. And socialism is socialism no matter what you call it. And I don't believe Tulsi wants anything to do with socialism...

Fact is "Socialism" is already here...I just live in the dumbest Country in the World IMO......anything thats saids "Public" is 'Socialism" let's bale out the "Banks" thats OK and am sure you didn't agree with it..but no one did anything about it, no Protest or anything because it's what we have been saying all along its "Socialism for the Rich.capitalism for the Rest"...why not spend are tax money on the people who pay there taxes? the working class....and by the way we overthrow a ny type of Socialism anywhere it shows up (But Europe) where it is everywhere in the north....

As for Tulsi she is a "Socialist" know your facts and she wants to stop all these "Foreign Wars" in which would cut military spending which is out to control..

https://gabbard.house.gov/addressing...ge-aauw-hawaii

"Now, this year I’ve supported legislation like the College for All Act, which would eliminate tuition and fees at four-year public colleges and universities for families that make up to $125,000 a year, and it would make community college tuition fee-free for everyone-- something that’s already practice in countries like Germany, Finland, Denmark, Iceland, Norway and Sweden. It would also help us to dramatically reduce crushing student loan debt for both our students and their parents by cutting all student loan interest rates for new borrowers in half; enabling existing borrowers to refinance their loans based on the interest rates available to new borrowers – less than 2 percent for federal loans made to undergraduates; and preventing the federal government from profiting off of the student loan program. I’ve also helped introduce legislation that was recently signed into law that would extend and expand higher education benefits for our veteran in the Forever GI Bill. It would also- there is other legislation that I have supported to assist refugees and people who are seeking asylum to help them get in state tuition rates, and open the door for new opportunities to them."

https://www.tulsigabbard.org/tulsi-g...n-medicare-all

"Tulsi strongly supports the Medicare for All Act and serves on the Medicare for All Caucus"

[Sayheykid]

Re: Biden roars back: Super Tuesday

'fdr"

His first 100 days....


https://www.history.com/news/fast-fa...first-100-days

"When did the first 100 days become a key benchmark for a U.S. presidential administration?
In the United States, no one talked that much about the importance of a president’s first 100 days—until Franklin D. Roosevelt took office in 1933. He took swift action to calm the nation’s crippling financial panic (cue the Emergency Banking Act and the “fireside chats” that became Roosevelt’s signature) and began rolling out the programs that made up his New Deal, including 15 major pieces of legislation in the first 100 days. FDR’s extraordinary productivity translated into enormous popularity, and he set a first 100-day standard against which all future U.S. presidents would (perhaps unfairly) be measured."

[Sayheykid]

Re: Biden roars back: Super Tuesday

Friday’s announcement by President Trump and China that they have reached a Phase One trade deal that includes canceling the imposition of new U.S. tariffs on Chinese products is good news for the American people. It is a huge deal, fulfilling yet another Trump campaign promise and confirming his strategy of using America’s enormous economic leverage to compel our trading partners to deal with us fairly.


https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/andy...mpaign-promise


Sent from the Jupiter 2 at Alpasentory!

From the man who says he knows the "art of the Deal" he seems to have been brought to the cleaners.....

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/ar...t-work/603637/

https://www.rollingstone.com/politic...e-deal-762420/

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020...one-china-deal

"Yet the first reports on the details suggest something less than a “very large” deal—it seems more a pause and truce. Still, the world will be spared the round of United States tariffs that were scheduled for December 15. By 2020, Trump's trade wars could cost the global economy $700 billion, the International Monetary Fund estimates. More tariffs would have cost more still.

Under the deal, China will increase some agricultural purchases from the United States, which it would have done anyway because the country is in the throes of a swine flu that has killed 100 million pigs and cut the country’s pork production in half. China has also made promises to improve its protection of intellectual property—something else that China was already doing anyway.

In other words, the United States gained little from the self-destructive trade war that Trump started. As the Bloomberg trade columnist David Fickling quipped on news of the deal: “It's a relief when a nation decides to stop punching itself in the face; how much better if it hadn’t started, though.”


https://www.globalresearch.ca/trump-...elling/5705639

'
On March 10, intra-Afghan dialogue is supposed to discuss prisoner swap arrangements. Ghani objected saying “(i)t is not the authority of the (US) to decide. (It’s) only a facilitator.”

On March 3, Trump spoke with Taliban leaders in Doha. A day later, Pentagon warplanes terror-bombed Taliban fighters in Nahr-e Saraj.

Reportedly their fighters killed 30 Afghan forces and four civilians in areas they control."