Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Taking A Stand!!!

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Local Union
    492
    Employer
    ABF
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    37,893
    Rep Power
    861

    Default Teamsters Applaud Judge's Ruling to Continue Pipeline Construction

    I am reading so many different things about this on my FB news feed I cannot keep up. I read last night that Obama had stopped the pipeline somehow. I also read that the Sioux tribe had many opportunities as well as the general public, to attend meetings to stop the pipeline and they did not attend (before it was built). Who knows.

    (WASHINGTON) – The Teamsters Union is pleased with a ruling today by U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg that will allow for the continued construction of the Dakota Access pipeline.

    Judge Boasberg ruled against an injunction filed by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe to halt the pipeline project that is currently under construction in North Dakota. The Dakota Access pipeline was lawfully approved by four states, including North Dakota, and the United States Army Corps of Engineers. All supporters and opponents of the project had the equal right to voice their opinions on the project and engage in a civil debate regarding the merits of the pipeline, including in three public hearings held throughout the state.
    https://teamster.org/news/2016/09/te...e-construction

  2. #2
    Taking A Stand!!!

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Local Union
    492
    Employer
    ABF
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    37,893
    Rep Power
    861

    Default Dakota pipeline divides unions from liberal activists

    Me being a liberal in some ways, especially when it comes to labor, there are some good points made in this article but I think it is fair to saythis was not written by a Democrat or a pro labor person for that matter!
    The Dakota Access Pipeline protests received a big media boost when Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein managed to earn herself an arrest warrant after vandalizing some construction equipment. Liberals love a good protest if it involves any sort of environmental activism and such gatherings are sure to draw the usual crowd of Gaia worshipers. But that’s only one slice of the Democratic pie, and they run in very different social circles from the labor unions which fund the election efforts of most Democrats. This week these two groups came into direct conflict as the AFL-CIO came out in support of the pipeline and all the jobs it will create, even as the environmentalists insisted that it must be shut down. (Washington Free Beacon)
    This is yet another example of how the national coalition of Democratic voters is a patchwork affair which brings in people with very different interests which don’t always align. The labor unions are all about jobs. (Mind you, they’re not always about the workers, but rather the number of people who are enlisted to pay dues.) Trumka recognizes that this pipeline represents thousands of high paying jobs which will last for years. At some point you have to set aside the talking points of political activists and get down to business.
    Dakota pipeline divides unions from liberal activists - Hot Air Hot Air

  3. #3
    Taking A Stand!!!

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Local Union
    492
    Employer
    ABF
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    37,893
    Rep Power
    861

    Default Re: Teamsters Applaud Judge's Ruling to Continue Pipeline Construction

    Teamsters, unions question Dakota Access reconsideration

    The Obama administration’s decision to withdraw and reconsider permits it issued for the proposed Dakota Access crude oil pipeline raises serious questions about the future of building US systems and the livelihoods of the project’s construction workers, general presidents of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and four other labor unions said (OGJ Online, Sept. 12, 2016).

    “The project is being built with an all-union workforce and workers are earning family-sustaining wages, with family health care and retirement contributions,” they said in an Oct. 3 letter to US President Barack Obama. “However, the project delays are already putting members out of work and causing hardships for thousands of families.”

    The Sept. 9 decision to withdraw a US Army Corps of Engineers permit for a portion of the proposed 1,172-mile, 30-in. pipeline that would connect the Bakken and Three Forks production areas in North Dakota to Patoka, Ill., came months after the project won final state and federal approvals after more than 4 years of state and federal reviews, the letter said.

    It said the withdrawal and reconsideration decision also came hours after Judge James F. Boasberg of US District Court for the District of Columbia denied a request for a preliminary injunction by the Standing Rock Sioux Indian tribe and other opponents who argued that consultations had not been adequate.
    http://www.ogj.com/articles/2016/10/...ideration.html

 

 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334