Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Conspiracy Theories...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Conspiracy Theories...

    Today is Tuesday, Jan. 27, the 27th day of 2021.The 8th day of Biden's Pretend Presidency...

    On this day in 1998 - U.S. First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton appeared on NBC's "Today" show. She charged that the allegations against her husband were the work of a "vast right-wing conspiracy."



    “It’s just a very unfortunate turn of events that we are using the criminal justice system to try and achieve political ends in this country. I just think that a lot of this is deliberately designed to sensationalize charges against my husband because everything else they tried has failed and I also believe that it is part of an effort… very frankly to undo the results of two elections.

    “The great story here for anybody willing to find it and write about it and explain it is this vast right wing conspiracy that has been conspiring against my husband since the day he announced for president”
    President Clinton impeached

    After nearly 14 hours of debate, the House of Representatives approves two articles of impeachment against President Bill Clinton, charging him with lying under oath to a federal grand jury and obstructing justice. Clinton, the second president in American history to be impeached, vowed to finish his term.

    In November 1995, Clinton began an affair with Monica Lewinsky, a 21-year-old unpaid intern. Over the course of a year and a half, the president and Lewinsky had nearly a dozen sexual encounters in the White House. In April 1996, Lewinsky was transferred to the Pentagon. That summer, she first confided in Pentagon co-worker Linda Tripp about her sexual relationship with the president. In 1997, with the relationship over, Tripp began secretly to record conversations with Lewinsky, in which Lewinsky gave Tripp details about the affair.
    https://www.history.com/this-day-in-...nton-impeached

    https://www.softschools.com/facts/us...al_facts/3893/
    Thought for the day… “Politicians lie… that's just what they do”

    Ask yourself… with all the wacky conspiracy theories out there that have been floating around for ages that have always been ignored by our politicians and MSM except for an occasional laugh or two … then why are the politicians and the MSM of today going on an all out national campaign claiming the election fraud is a conspiracy theory… starting with the heavy censorship and banning on social media… trying to shut down news networks such as Oann and Newsmax for so called… “spreading misinformation… conspiracy theories and outright lies” and implying that all of the Trump supporters are domestic terrorists? And we are all supposed to just accept it as a conspiracy theory with no other explanation than it was a lie… nothing to see here and just move on.

  • #2
    Re: Conspiracy Theories...

    "The truth is like a lion, you don’t have to defend it. Let it loose, it will defend itself." -- Saint Augutine

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Conspiracy Theories...

      US Investigating 'Havana Syndrome' Directed Energy Attack Near White House

      Since 2017 controversy and speculation has abounded over the legitimacy of the so-called 'Havana syndrome" story, which involved some 50 diplomatic officials working at the US Embassy in Cuba coming down with strange illnesses and symptoms - from headaches to vomiting to 'brain trauma' - which was blamed on high tech covert 'sonic attacks' by nefarious actors. Officials were quick to blame either Russian intelligence or Cuban operatives in what sounded like a wild James Bond style bit of futuristic espionage. Last week the allegations returned to national media spotlight after defense officials said they believe Russia is likely behind 'directed energy' attacks on US troops in northeast Syria. Apparently some US troops occupying the country began reporting'flu-like symptoms „which caused the DoD to investigate possible linkage to microwave or directed energy weapons on the battlefield of Syria. Politico reported that 'officials identified Russia as a likely culprit, according to two people with direct knowledge of the matter.”

      And now CNN is reporting what is perhaps the most bizarre and outlandish instance of this yet - a 'sonic attack' which sickened a top administration official while standing just outside White House grounds...

      US investigating possible mysterious directed energy attack near White House

      Washington (CNN) Federal agencies are investigating at least two possible incidents on US soil, including one near the White House in November of last year, that appear similar to mysterious, invisible attacks that have led to debilitating symptoms for dozens of US personnel abroad. Multiple sources familiar with the matter tell CNN that while the Pentagon and other agencies probing the matter have reached no clear conclusions on what happened, the fact that such an attack might have taken place so close to the White House is particularly alarming. Defense officials briefed lawmakers on the Senate and House Armed Services Committees on the matter earlier this month, including on the incident near the White House. That incident, which occurred near the Ellipse, the large oval lawn on the south side of the White House, sickened one National Security Council official, according to multiple current and former US officials and sources familiar with the matter.

      In a separate 2019 episode, a White House official reported a similar attack while walking her dog in a Virginia suburb just outside Washington, GQ reported last year. Those sickened reported similar symptoms to CIA and State Department personnel impacted overseas, and officials quickly began to investigate the incident as a possible „Havana syndrome” attack. That name refers to unexplained symptoms that US personnel in Cuba began experiencing in late 2016 -- a varying set of complaints that includes ear popping, vertigo, pounding headaches and nausea, sometimes accompanied by an unidentified „piercing directional noise.”

      Rumors have long swirled around Washington about similar incidents within the United States. While the recent episodes around Washington appear similar to the previous apparent attacks affecting diplomats, CIA officers and other US personnel serving in Cuba, Russia and China, investigators have not determined whether the puzzling incidents at home are connected to those that have occurred abroad or who may be behind them, sources tell CNN. Defense officials who briefed lawmakers said it was possible Russia was behind the attacks, but they did not have enough information to say for sure. Another former US official involved in the investigation at the time said China was also among the suspects.

      https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/29/polit...use/index.html
      The October 2020 GQ report was somewhat comically titled, 'The Mystery of the Immaculate Concussion". It detailed that „According to three sources familiar with the incident, a White House staffer was hit while walking her dog in Arlington, Virginia. Her dog started seizing up. Then she felt it too: a high-pitched ringing in her ears, an intense headache, and a tingling on the side of her face.” Again, despite the wealth of what is perhaps anecdotal evidence and testimony, and with at this point the original Havana episode serving as the clearest evidence yet of a large group of people saying they experienced bizarre unexplainable symptoms all at once, it remains that US intelligence and defense officials have failed to produce known evidence that Russia or a US enemy zapped Americans with an advanced microwave weapon.







      https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...ar-white-house

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Conspiracy Theories...

        Speaking of conspiracies... the media and politicians wonder why so many people have no trust and faith in our wonderful scientific community and really aren't that concerned about climate change who think of it as nothing but fear mongering.

        From Wiki...

        Alleged political conspiracies

        • Liberal extremists: There are theories claiming that "climate change is a hoax perpetrated by leftist radicals to undermine local sovereignty", or "climate science is less about science and more about socialist ideology".In 2017, James Inhofe told the 12th International Conference on Climate Change "The liberal extremists are not going to give up. Obama has built a culture of radical alarmists, and they’ll be back.
        Climate change conspiracy theories have resulted in poor action or no action at all to effectively mitigate the damage done by global warming. In some countries like the United States of America, 40% of Americans believe that climate change is a hoax in spite of the fact that there is a 100% consensus among climate scientists that it is not according to a report in 2019.President Donald Trump previously even pulled the United States out of the Paris Agreement, which was set up in the hopes of reducing global warming.There may be an ideology of climate change denial in some regions of the world, which would lead to disagreements over how to handle climate change and what should be done in the face of it. Steve Connor links the terms "hoax" and "conspiracy," saying, "Reading through the technical summary of this draft (IPCC) report, it is clear that no one could go away with the impression that climate change is some conspiratorial hoax by the science establishment, as some would have us believe."

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global...spiracy_theory
        Wiki now is trying to claim...

        Before the 1980s, it was unclear whether warming by greenhouse gases would dominate aerosol-induced cooling. Scientists then often used the term inadvertent climate modification to refer to the human impact on the climate. In the 1980s, the terms global warming and climate change were popularised.In the 2000s, the term climate change increased in popularity. Global warming usually refers to human-induced warming of the Earth system, whereas climate change can refer to natural or anthropogenic change. The two terms are often used interchangeably. In 2019, Oxford Languages chose climate emergency as its word of the year, defining it as "a situation in which urgent action is required to reduce or halt climate change and avoid potentially irreversible environmental damage resulting from it".

        Public debate about climate change has been strongly affected by climate change denial and misinformation, which originated in the United States and has since spread to other countries, particularly Canada and Australia. The actors behind climate change denial form a well-funded and relatively coordinated coalition of fossil fuel companies, industry groups, conservative think tanks, and contrarian scientists.Like the tobacco industry before, the main strategy of these groups has been to manufacture doubt about scientific data and results.Many who deny, dismiss, or hold unwarranted doubt about the scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change are labelled as "climate change skeptics", which several scientists have noted is a misnomer.

        There are different variants of climate denial: some deny that warming takes place at all, some acknowledge warming but attribute it to natural influences, and some minimise the negative impacts of climate change. Manufacturing uncertainty about the science later developed into a manufactured controversy: creating the belief that there is significant uncertainty about climate change within the scientific community in order to delay policy changes.Strategies to promote these ideas include criticism of scientific institutions, and questioning the motives of individual scientists.An echo chamber of climate-denying blogs and media has further fomented misunderstanding of climate change.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change
        Yep... they actually can't understand why there would be such mistrust when it comes to our scientific community... government and media. Well... let's see... maybe this could be a major reason why to those of us who have been around for awhile...

        50 years of predictions that the climate apocalypse is nigh

        Apocalypse . . . now? For the past two weeks in Glasgow, Scotland, world leaders have gathered at COP 26, the United Nations Climate Change Conference, to listen to the same message: Disaster is just around the corner. “The world has to step up, and it has to step up now,” former President Barack Obama said. “When it comes to climate, time really is running out.” Professional yeller Greta Thunberg demanded the United Nations declare a “systemwide climate emergency,” and force countries to take action. Press accounts were similarly Chicken Little-esque. If developed nations don’t phase out oil and gas and give $100 billion in “climate financing,” Paul Behrens, professor in environmental change, told Politico that “the only fact about the future I can declare with certainty is that the world as we know it is coming to an end.” If it all sounds slightly familiar, consider this news story from 1972:





        Among the predictions:
        * Major European cities will be sunk beneath rising seas
        * Britain is plunged into a “Siberian” climate by 2020
        * Nuclear conflict, mega-droughts, famine and widespread rioting will erupt across the world

        The Guardian described this as “humiliating to the Bush administration” because they weren’t doing enough to tackle climate change. No word on whether the Pentagon or the Guardian are humiliated now that it’s 2021 and Britain is still experiencing summer. But then, another dire prediction came and went in the meantime. In 2007, Rajendra Pachauri, head of the UN climate panel, said, “If there is no action before 2012, that’s too late”:



        That gives us until 2030 — or 58 years after the warnings of 1972. Advocates for change believe if they just scream louder, or write more like the Book of Revelations, they’ll get the world to agree to a complete upheaval of modern life and trillions in spending. But after decades of alarmism, they sound like the boy who cried warming. People have tuned them out. Climate change is real, but adapting to it, mitigating it with technology is the most realistic solution. Will China and India just give up on coal, gas and oil overnight? No, and neither will the United States. But emissions already are falling in Western countries, the world is innovating.

        We predict things are going to get better. Ten years. Twenty years, tops. Maybe 30.

        https://nypost.com/2021/11/12/50-yea...lypse-is-nigh/
        And... what do they say about the CCP ( Chinese Communist Party) virus... Wuhan Virus or what the politically correct like to call it... Covid... that's right... we must all “trust in the science” !!! They must have fogotten about a book called "The Boy Who Cried Wolf"... but I sure haven't.

        Comment

        Working...
        X