The path to challenging "systemic voter fraud" during the 2020 presidential election

[strapdrager]

Re: The path to challenging "systemic voter fraud" during the 2020 presidential elect

“So on January 6, I’m joining with the fighters in the Congress and we are going to object to electors from states that didn’t run clean elections.”

Read Newsmax: Gaetz Says He Will Challenge Electoral College Votes on Jan. 6
Urgent: Do you approve of Pres. Trump’s job performance? Vote Here Now!

[strapdrager]

Re: The path to challenging "systemic voter fraud" during the 2020 presidential elect

https://youtu.be/PWKfJ3ecmKs

[Docker]

Re: The path to challenging "systemic voter fraud" during the 2020 presidential elect

The Plot to Steal America

[crazy]

Re: The path to challenging "systemic voter fraud" during the 2020 presidential elect

Data Experts Claim Over 790k “Laundered” Votes “Injected” into System in Arizona


https://charliekirk.com/news/breakin...em-in-arizona/

[crazy]

Re: The path to challenging "systemic voter fraud" during the 2020 presidential elect

EXCLUSIVE UPDATE: Peter Navarro Expands Election Fraud Memo, Number Of Illegal Ballots Dwarf Biden Victory Margin By Over Two

https://thenationalpulse.com/breakin...n-memo-update/

White House Advisor Peter Navarro released an exclusive update to his “Immaculate Deception” election fraud report describing how in Michigan the number of potentially illegal ballots is over two times greater than Joe Biden’s alleged margin of victory.
Navarro, the Director of Trade and Manufacturing Policy, details in the memo addressed to “War Room and American Republic” how election fraud tainted nearly 400,000 ballots in the critical swing state of Michigan.
He describes the three forms of election irregularities that interfered with honest election results:

There are over 379,000 potentially illegal ballots in Michigan – more than twice the alleged Biden victory margin. These 379,000 potentially illegal ballots have been called into question by three types of election irregularities – outright fraud in the form of dead voters; a significant process foul in the form of a failure to provide adequate voter identification check; and significant statistical anomalies in the form of inexplicable vote surges.

Irregularities include over 11,000 presumed dead individuals voting, 174,384 absentee ballots out of 566,694 absentee ballots cast in Wayne County being counted despite lacking a voter registration number, and “voting machine irregularities” contributing to “at least 305,000 additional ballots in question.”

READ
https://thenationalpulse.com/breakin...n-memo-update/

[crazy]

Re: The path to challenging "systemic voter fraud" during the 2020 presidential elect

Another interesting take of the election fraud that happened in November..

There were voluminous reports, from eyewitnesses and experts, of widespread election fraud in the so-called battle states and beyond. Specific allegations were made, and evidence of election rules violations and statistical anomalies were collected. Yet the courts refused to listen to virtually all witnesses and experts, rejected most of the evidence, and refused to subpoena more evidence requested by the plaintiffs. Many state government officials and some top representatives of companies supplying voting machines and software categorically denied any election fraud.

So, on the one hand, there is plenty of evidence strongly suggesting that the widely observed election fraud took place during the 2020 presidential elections. On the other hand, all we have are assurances of the election fraud–deniers that there was no election fraud, which were later changed to admissions that although election fraud did take place, it wasn't large enough to sway the results. No verifiable facts that would clearly invalidate the specific election fraud allegations were presented to the public as of time of this writing, while quite a lot of obstruction of investigations, like denials to subject the vote-counting software and hardware to examination by independent experts, took place. Some of this obstruction had all appearances of a cover-up.

I must say that anyone who, knowing the above, claims that Joe Biden has received required majorities of legitimate votes to become a duly elected president is either stupid or willing to cover up the truth about the rigged elections that we have allowed to continue in America.

I am not going to analyze the stupid. However, I would like to look into possible reasons why an intelligent observer would opt for cover-up of election fraud if it did take place.



Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...#ixzz6hvSSx0az
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

[2631]

Re: The path to challenging "systemic voter fraud" during the 2020 presidential elect

I'm surprised that after carrying Trump's water for so long that Barr would say there wasn't election fraud. I say again lock them up. Hopefully I could live thru another four years of Trump and McConnell. Real and replace on day one it will be so easy.

[crazy]

Re: The path to challenging "systemic voter fraud" during the 2020 presidential elect

Some more on PA..

PA Republican lawmakers: Analysis finds presidential election numbers don't add up

HARRISBURG, Pa. (WJAC) — A group of Republican lawmakers say they’ve performed an extensive analysis of election day data and they’ve found “troubling” discrepancies.

According to State Rep. Frank Ryan (R-Lebanon), 17 lawmakers sponsored and participated in the analysis.

Ryan, who is a certified public accountant, says they discovered discrepancies between the numbers of total votes counted and total number of voters who voted in the 2020 General Election which is making them question how the results could have been certified by Gov. Tom Wolf and Secretary of the Commonwealth Kathy Boockvar.

According to Ryan, the analysis compared official county election results to the total number of voters who voted Nov. 3, as recorded by the Department of State.

Ryan says they found that 6,962,607 total ballots were reported as being cast, while DoS/SURE system records indicated that only 6,760,230 total voters actually voted.

Among the 6,962,607 total ballots cast, 6,931,060 total votes were counted in the presidential race, including all three candidates on the ballot and write-in candidates, according to Ryan.
He says the difference of 202,377 more votes cast than voters voting, together with the 31,547 over- and under-votes in the presidential race, adds up to a discrepancy of 170,830 votes, which is more than twice the reported statewide difference between Donald Trump and Joe Biden.

Pennsylvania’s election results were certified Nov. 24 and Gov. Wolf issued a certificate of ascertainment of presidential electors stating that Biden received 80,555 more votes than Trump.

Read More
https://wjactv.com/news/local/pa-rep...f-i8optXjlYK6Y

[1484-1075]

Re: The path to challenging "systemic voter fraud" during the 2020 presidential elect

Some more on PA..

PA Republican lawmakers: Analysis finds presidential election numbers don't add up

Absolutely zero interest by any of the so called media, the clowns that pretend they are the protecters of the public.Only if the shoe was on the other foot would they be outraged,"anoynonmus sources" are much more reliable than black and white actual figures.The dims have coordinated a massive voter cover-up and fraud, with the swamp totally in charge.

[2631]

Re: The path to challenging "systemic voter fraud" during the 2020 presidential elect

The dims have coordinated a massive voter cover-up and fraud, with the swamp totally in charge.

If that is the case then I blame the POTUS. He promised to drain the swamp. It would appear that his choice for AG Barr is part of that swamp. Trump had 4 years to ensure a fair election. What did he do to drain the swamp? The buck stops at his desk.

[crazy]

Re: The path to challenging "systemic voter fraud" during the 2020 presidential elect

Don't know if this is true or not but it was re-tweeted by Trump early this morning..

A Simple Test for the Extent of Vote Fraud with Absentee Ballots in the 2020 Presidential Election: Georgia and Pennsylvania Data

John R. Lott
US Department of Justice

Date Written: December 21, 2020

Abstract
This study provides measures of vote fraud in the 2020 presidential election. It first compares Fulton county’s precincts that are adjacent to similar precincts in neighboring counties that had no allegations of fraud to isolate the impact of Fulton county’s vote-counting process (including potential fraud). In measuring the difference in President Trump’s vote share of the absentee ballots for these adjacent precincts, we account for the difference in his vote share of the in-person voting and the difference in registered voters’ demographics. The best estimate shows an unusual 7.81% drop in Trump’s percentage of the absentee ballots for Fulton County alone of 11,350 votes, or over 80% of Biden’s vote lead in Georgia. The same approach is applied to Allegheny County in Pennsylvania for both absentee and provisional ballots. The estimated number of fraudulent votes from those two sources is about 55,270 votes.

Second, vote fraud can increase voter turnout rate. Increased fraud can take many forms: higher rates of filling out absentee ballots for people who hadn’t voted, dead people voting, ineligible people voting, or even payments to legally registered people for their votes. However, the increase might not be as large as the fraud if votes for opposing candidates are either lost, destroyed, or replaced with ballots filled out for the other candidate. The estimates here indicate that there were 70,000 to 79,000 “excess” votes in Georgia and Pennsylvania. Adding Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, and Wisconsin, the total increases to up to 289,000 excess votes.

Keywords: Vote Fraud, absentee ballots, voter turnout rate

JEL Classification: K14

Suggested Citation:
Lott, John R., A Simple Test for the Extent of Vote Fraud with Absentee Ballots in the 2020 Presidential Election: Georgia and Pennsylvania Data (December 21, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3756988

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....act_id=3756988

[strapdrager]

Re: The path to challenging "systemic voter fraud" during the 2020 presidential elect

https://fb.watch/2ImCRfsCX_/

Only way I can share this

[crazy]

Re: The path to challenging "systemic voter fraud" during the 2020 presidential elect

https://fb.watch/2ImCRfsCX_/

Only way I can share this

I have seen her videos on social media platforms ,I think it was MeWe .. They have a whole lot of conspiracy posters.. What she said sounds real good but in reality will it ever happen??

[strapdrager]

Re: The path to challenging "systemic voter fraud" during the 2020 presidential elect

https://youtu.be/EjbAFuoQOvo

This is live right now
Earth scattering evidence

[crazy]

Re: The path to challenging "systemic voter fraud" during the 2020 presidential elect

Here we go in Georgia. The hearings are today..

RAFFENSPERGER GETS CAUGHT: Georgia Ballots Were Printed DIFFERENTLY for GOP Counties vs. DEM Counties — Election Was Rigged!

Members of Georgia’s Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Elections and members of the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing to study Georgia’s Election Laws, and the numerous voting irregularities in the 2020 presidential election.

The hearing comes after a Senate subcommittee held a hearing last week at the capitol to discuss perceived voting irregularities in November’s presidential election.

During the hearing witness Jovan Pulitzer was invited to testify on the irregularities in the November 3rd election.
Jovan Pulitzer is a brilliant inventor and author best known for creating and patenting CRQ and has founded companies that included seed investment rounds ranging from $1.6m to over $250m.

Joe Hoft wrote about this brilliant man first here at The Gateway Pundit.

Read more
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...sharingbuttons