2020 Vote Fraud Witnesses

[crazy]

Re: 2020 Vote Fraud Witnesses

You would have posted something if you had it.
Since you haven't said it, I will. Both sides cheat and steal. The numbers are so low that they don't mean anything. The constant screams of lie, cheat and steal are ridiculous.
So continue your hypocritical stance on everything. It doesn't change the facts. Biden won, tRump lost. That's all that matters.

Trump Supporter Arrested For Voting Twice, Claims “Polls Are Rigged” ( sure they are ! )


https://www.goliath.com/random/trump...ls-are-rigged/

I expected no less from you.. Go back through this thread and other threads as many stories have been posted.. Seems you conveniently missed them.... But I do agree with you that both sides do cheat and I believe they should be punished and not with a slap on the wrist.. And if the Democrats didn't have a large scale voter fraud in the 2020 election then why are they trying to stop ANY and every investigation into the election?? So in your mind Biden won and you believe he got more than 81,000,000 votes and that is your right to believe it as I along with most likely more than 81,000,000 still believe Trump actually won the election but since Trump is connected the the spineless Republicans' we are where we are today.. More people including many Democrats believe the Democrats cheated.. You seem to be one of the kool-aid drinkers..

[crazy]

Re: 2020 Vote Fraud Witnesses

Here's How You Know Democrats Rigged and Stole the 2020 Election

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

Let me put this in terms even Democrats can understand.

Let's say a white police officer killed a black man who did nothing wrong. Unlike George Floyd, this man had not committed any crime, did not resist arrest, didn't have fentanyl in his system and had no record of violent crime. Assume this poor guy was a law-abiding, taxpaying, churchgoing American and that the cop killed him for the crime of "driving while black."

How do the police react? They say the shooting was righteous. They refuse to investigate. There is bodycam footage, but they refuse to release it. And get this: They refuse to allow anyone to even talk about it. If any cop talks about it, he loses his job. If anyone in the black community talks about it, social media will suspend them or ban them for life.

What would all of that mean to you? Guilty as charged, right? The police must be covering up a crime. No one who's innocent acts like that, right?

Guess what? That's equivalent to the reaction (or, should I say, overreaction) of liberals, Democrats and assorted socialists and communists when Republicans make accusations of massive voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election.

I thought we're all allowed to have our opinion in America. I thought we have free speech. I thought we have a right to investigate. I thought we have a right to see the videotapes. I thought we have a right to forensic audits.

I was wrong.

CARTOONS | STEVE BREEN
VIEW CARTOON
The fix is in. It's crystal clear to me now that not only was the election rigged but so is everything post-election. It's simple psychology. Just look at the absurd reaction, or overreaction, by Democrats.

Would anyone dare ban the right to discuss a possibly racist police killing? Can you imagine the reaction by liberals, black activists and the American Civil Liberties Union? What if the Minneapolis police were to permanently ban any discussion of George Floyd's death? What if every black American trying to give his or her opinion on Twitter, Facebook or YouTube were banned for life?

Who would react like that? Only guilty people.

Here are the questions I want answered.
-- If Democrats didn't rig and steal the election, why are they so afraid of forensic audits in key battleground states, specifically the current audit in Arizona?
-- When Trump was an 8-to-1 landslide favorite with bettors around the world late on election night and clearly headed toward a landslide electoral victory, why did five states suddenly announce they would pause counting for the night? And how come Biden was suddenly ahead by morning?
-- How come Michigan apparently had a dump of 149,772 votes at 6:31 a.m. on Nov. 4, 96% of which went to Biden?
-- How did Wisconsin count 149,520 votes for Biden from 3:26 to 3:44 a.m. on Nov. 4?
-- How come Philadelphia vote counters were so desperate to keep witnesses out of the counting room? Why did they refuse entry to witnesses (to Republicans) until those witnesses had a court order in hand?
-- Why were the windows in a vote-counting location in Detroit covered with cardboard so nobody (no Republican) could see inside?
-- There are videotapes filmed in Detroit of vans pulling up in the middle of the night with what obviously look like boxes of ballots. In Atlanta, there are videotapes that clearly show ballot containers appearing at a vote-counting location after a fake water main break was used to force all GOP witnesses out of the counting room. Why can't we discuss these videotapes?
How come Twitter banned me for life over mentioning these videotapes?
-- How come the Arizona Senate's liaison for the vote audit says Maricopa County hasn't complied with the subpoena by turning over passwords to Dominion voting machines?
-- How come the Biden DOJ suddenly wants to stop the Arizona audit?
These are all valid questions. Why do we get backlash for asking them and posting them on social media? What are Democrats hiding? What are they so afraid of?

In the end, that's the proof Democrats rigged and stole the 2020 presidential election. The truth is in their ridiculous, heavy-handed overreaction. They're desperate to stop you from looking into or even talking about this.

Democrats are guilty as sin.

https://townhall.com/columnists/wayn...ction-n2589148

[fxstc07]

Re: 2020 Vote Fraud Witnesses

I expected no less from you.. Go back through this thread and other threads as many stories have been posted.. Seems you conveniently missed them.... But I do agree with you that both sides do cheat and I believe they should be punished and not with a slap on the wrist.. And if the Democrats didn't have a large scale voter fraud in the 2020 election then why are they trying to stop ANY and every investigation into the election?? So in your mind Biden won and you believe he got more than 81,000,000 votes and that is your right to believe it as I along with most likely more than 81,000,000 still believe Trump actually won the election but since Trump is connected the the spineless Republicans' we are where we are today.. More people including many Democrats believe the Democrats cheated.. You seem to be one of the kool-aid drinkers..

And I expect no less from you.

Like you said, go back though these threads and read.
When asked about recounts, I said:

Isn't 3 recounts enough ? How many are needed ? 30 ... 300 ... 3000 ? Or just enough until somebody gives you the answer you want to hear ?

Remember ? You didn't answer.
How many times do we need to count and recount ?

As for the rest of your ramblings. Go to your refrigerator in the garage. It's full of kool-aid. And delusional conspiracy theories by the bottle.

[crazy]

Re: 2020 Vote Fraud Witnesses

And I expect no less from you.

Like you said, go back though these threads and read.
When asked about recounts, I said:
Remember ? You didn't answer.
How many times do we need to count and recount ?

As for the rest of your ramblings. Go to your refrigerator in the garage. It's full of kool-aid. And delusional conspiracy theories by the bottle.

Actually I did answer you, Post 134, must have been another post you skipped over.. If you continue to count the same fraudulent ballots you will come up with the same fraudulent results.. That is common sense 101.. Why is it that the Democrats are afraid of a forensic recount where they actually check each ballot?? Maybe because they don't want anyone to find the fraudulent ballots??

[Docker]

Re: 2020 Vote Fraud Witnesses

Like you said, go back though these threads and read.
When asked about recounts, I said:
Remember ? You didn't answer.
How many times do we need to count and recount ?

He sure as hell did answer it... as a matter of fact... in the very next post just two afters after you asked it... he can't help the fact that you have the attention span of a gnat...



There's losing debates and then there's totally being annihilated in debates and I'm sorry to inform you but you are the epitome of the latter of the two. I don't know why you feel the need that you have to keep auditioning for the role of our forum jester because you have proven that you are the best qualified for that position time after time. After all... you can't lose any more credibility and look more foolish than you have been since having your mod powers stripped.

For heaven sakes... just admit it... you have no comprehension skills... the attention span of a gnat and only see what you want to see.

[Docker]

Re: 2020 Vote Fraud Witnesses

Like you said, go back though these threads and read.
When asked about recounts, I said:
Remember ? You didn't answer.
How many times do we need to count and recount ?

Actually I did answer you, Post 134, must have been another post you skipped over.. If you continue to count the same fraudulent ballots you will come up with the same fraudulent results.. That is common sense 101.. Why is it that the Democrats are afraid of a forensic recount where they actually check each ballot?? Maybe because they don't want anyone to find the fraudulent ballots??

I'm sorry crazy but you can't apply common sense 101 when dealing with the likes of fx... it's well beyond his understanding. He's a student of the loony leftist liberal ideology that believes that doing the same thing over and over again and not getting a different result is a reliable method of proof. But ordinary people realize that's a close proximity to the definition of insanity...

“The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results.”

Just think of fx as being in the same category as Uncle Joe... he won't remember anything as it really happened an hour after the fact... that's if he really understood things in the first place.

It's also clear by now that he can't remember anything positive that Joe has accomplished since taking office or he damn well would of posted something... anything already... lol

[Docker]

Re: 2020 Vote Fraud Witnesses

Vote Fraud: This Election Was Brought to you by the Letter Z

If you asked any sentient person what would happen if you gave millions of dollars to counties run by Democrats in battleground states in exchange for turning over to your left-wing designees the right to control election procedures and counting of ballots (in contravention of the constitutions of the affected states and the U.S. Constitution, which places the responsibility for setting election rules with state legislatures), they’d agree that the likelihood that the process would be corrupted was great. And as evidence slowly surfaces of the consequences of the Zuckerberg Foundation’s selective grants and the conditions of those grants, it seems undeniable that there was massive corruption. The Election Wizard made a startling claim this week. In preparing the U.S. Census, the government collects data on citizens who self-report having voted in presidential elections. The latest census report reveals a starling anomaly: Four million fewer people reported having voted in the 2020 presidential election than the official tally shows. Pollster Richard Baris says the Census figures on voting are usually “spot on” and when they missed (by not a great deal) it was on over recorded, not under recorded, that is, they recorded more who voted than actually did.

This anomaly seems not so anomalous as more information is known about voting in Wisconsin, Arizona, and Nevada.



In Green Bay, Spitzer-Rubentein also was given boxes of blank ballots before the election.

Arizona (Maricopa County)

Maricopa County’s election board, under subpoena to turn over its election equipment and records, claimed this week it did not have “administrative access” to its voting machines. They claimed they had ceded it to their external vendor. That means, if the defense is accurate, outsiders had the ability to perform all the changes and functions in the system -- even the ability to completely control the system logs by deleting or altering them. They’ve also refused to turn over the routers for the computers, something that could result in contempt action by the court. The consistent and increasing efforts by Maricopa County election officials, Democratic Party and now the administration’s DoJ to end the Maricopa audit ordered by the state legislature seems to me a tell that it was every bit as corrupted as the challenges suggest it was.

Nevada

In December, Jesse Binnall testified before the Homeland security and Governmental Affairs Committee on the irregularities in the presidential election there. Among his claims: the rushed mail by ballot (without voter authentication) resulted in 42,000 people having voted twice; 1500 dead people were recorded as voting, more than 19,000 people voted who did not live in the state (figure does not include students or military), 8,000 people voted from nonexistent addresses; over 15,000 votes were cast from commercial or vacant addresses. In sum, he claimed over 130,000 “unique instances of voter fraud in Nevada” and he argued that the figure was “almost certainly higher.” He also cited the testimony of technical employees who said, “the number of votes recoded by voting machines were stored on USB drives and would change between the time the polls were closed" -- that “votes were literally appearing and disappearing in the dead of night.’ efforts to conduct a full inspection of the voting machines was denied.

The Nevada Supreme Court refused to upset the election upon Binnell’s claims. I can't find out whether Vote From Home or any other Zuckerberg-funded outfit was working in Nevada, but Binnall’s claims of people accessing the voting machinery and the great number of seemingly irregular votes sound familiar.

This week allies of Donald Trump announced the creation of the Election Integrity Alliance to combat election fraud and to provide resources “to state legislators and the public on challenges to free and fair elections.” Some states have already tightened up requirements for mail in balloting and authentication (voter ID) and have even made illegal the receipt of outside funding to local election officials.

It’s a start.

https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...knew_best.html

[crazy]

Re: 2020 Vote Fraud Witnesses

Meanwhile back in Arizona.

Maricopa County Elections Witness Testifies that Dominion Ran Entire Election – County Officials and Observers NEVER HAD Access or Passwords! (Video)

Back on November 30, 2020, Maricopa County elections witness Jan Bryant testified before the Arizona legislature.

Jan has a strong project management background. She could not believe what she witnessed during the 2020 election in Maricopa County, Arizona.

Jan said back on November 30, 2020, that Maricopa County officials DID NOT RUN THE ELECTION! Dominion employees John and Bruce did.

Jan’s testimony might explain why Maricopa County officials do not have Admin passwords or access to the Dominion voting machines.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...unty-machines/

Jan also testified under oath that county staff, not even IT staff were allowed access to the voting machines and that she witnessed Dominon employees with a laptop computer in the counting room.

Jan worked 6 days at MCTEC, has an MBA, and project management background in technology.

Jan Bryant: ….and back to my opening, I wanted to tell you that I do have a pretty strong project management technology background. This is not, I would say, everybody, raves about how we’ll run and how tight this room is that we were working in. I was in the (MCTEC) tabulation center. You know the glass (wall) and the servers in a glass room. All the computers are on a single cable that you can see. None of that matters because of two things. One, the Dominion employees were the only ones that were running any of that equipment.
So I’m, I was in the tabulation center six different days. Day and night shifts. And no county employees, no IT people, no one else was touching any of the software. They (Dominion) did all the training for the adjudicators, they ran all the reports. And so I brought this up on my very first day in the room. I said this doesn’t seem right, as a person with my background. Never in a million years would I turn my company’s most important things over to someone else. And there’s only two guys (Dominion’s Bruce & John) and they had whole control of everything.

I also participated in the (2%) random ballot selection for hand audit. Picking the ballots, you know, determining which bins we were going to select. And even with that, Dominion ran the report for it (which bins to pull). So no one, I mean, they (Dominion) knew exactly what was in the hand audit boxes. That made me nervous also. And they also knew when we pulled the last box, which was probably eight days before they quit counting ballots. As a senior manager over big projects, never in a million years would I have allowed some of the stuff that I saw going on there.

RECAP: The exact bins to be pulled for the mandated 2% hand audit were decided by Dominion staff, using their EMS software, not randomly.
The other thing that I wanted to make sure. The final week that they were counting ballots, I came in on I think a Tuesday. When I had left the Friday before I did NOT notice there was a laptop in the room behind the (glass) wall, that “John” the Dominion employee was working on. When I came in on Tuesday and walked around where they were doing the hand entry of ballots, I noticed that laptop sitting there and John was working on it. It’s not a secure room if you’re bringing a laptop in and out of a room. Who knows what happened there. Every one of the 50 desktops that were in there had a row of USB ports on the side of it. So I get very angry when I hear some of our leader here saying “Oh, it’s secure, nothing can get in or out.”. That’s not true. I will tell you that is probably the biggest issue that I had.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...sswords-video/

[fxstc07]

Re: 2020 Vote Fraud Witnesses

They are idiots.

'It makes us look like idiots': Arizona state senator disowns widely criticized election recount after seeing it in action

A GOP state senator in Arizona described the controversial vote audit in Maricopa County as "ridiculous" and an embarrassment in an interview with The New York Times on Friday.
Sen. Paul Boyer, a Republican who represents a suburb of Phoenix, told the publication that he initially supported and voted for the audit but that he regretted doing so after seeing how poorly it was being conducted.
"It makes us look like idiots," Boyer said. "Looking back, I didn't think it would be this ridiculous. It's embarrassing to be a state senator at this point."

Should all good repuklicans walk in lock step with their fuhrer ? Of course, that's evident here.

https://www.businessinsider.com/ariz...process-2021-5

[Docker]

Re: 2020 Vote Fraud Witnesses

They are idiots.

'It makes us look like idiots': Arizona state senator disowns widely criticized election recount after seeing it in action

Should all good repuklicans walk in lock step with their fuhrer ? Of course, that's evident here.

https://www.businessinsider.com/ariz...process-2021-5

Let's see... having a controversial vote audit to ensure everyone that there has been a fiar and just election is just "ridiculous" and an embarrassment...

And here you are... having the audacity to call others idiots... lol

See what I mean Crazy...you can't apply common sense 101 when dealing with the likes of fx... it's well beyond his understanding. He's a student of the loony leftist liberal ideology of dishonesty and deception.

[crazy]

Re: 2020 Vote Fraud Witnesses

They are idiots.

'It makes us look like idiots': Arizona state senator disowns widely criticized election recount after seeing it in action


Should all good repuklicans walk in lock step with their fuhrer ? Of course, that's evident here.

https://www.businessinsider.com/ariz...process-2021-5

And here we go again with the "Fuhrer" bullsh*t comments.. It does get old.. But you are a true liberal democrat.. Always accusing the other side of what you are alveary guilty of.. The Democratic party of today aligns more with the Nazi's of the past then they do with the American people.. Bet that makes you proud..

[fxstc07]

Re: 2020 Vote Fraud Witnesses

And here we go again with the "Fuhrer" bullsh*t comments.. It does get old.. But you are a true liberal democrat.. Always accusing the other side of what you are alveary guilty of.. The Democratic party of today aligns more with the Nazi's of the past then they do with the American people.. Bet that makes you proud..

Yea, just like all your dipshit comments.

Newsmax Host Ends Interview After Guest Destroys Newsmax For False Election Claims: ‘Are You Still Telling that Lie?’

In a wild, abrupt segment on Newsmax’s Wake Up America Monday, David Litt — who served as a speechwriter for former President Barack Obama — repeatedly trashed the network on which he was speaking over the retracted claims, reported to have been settled out of court.

“That’s fine, David,” the host said. “I know this is a very funny moment for you. I’m sure you didn’t sleep last night as you prepared to try and sort of get the morning anchor on Newsmax. I’d be happy to talk with you about whatever you want to talk about. Obviously, it’s not the topic that we have set up for right now. So if you’d like to talk about Saturday Night Live, I will do that with you. But obviously, I’m not gonna talk about anything else right now. So you decide right now, in this moment on live television, go ahead.”
Litt made his decision without hesitating.
“Did Dominion voting systems have any impact on the 2020 election?” Litt said.

The Newsmax feed immediately cut to an isolated shot of Finnerty, who had been sharing the screen with Litt.
“Oh, that’s unfortunate,” Finnerty calmly said — announcing that the interview was over. He added, sarcastically, “we look forward to having him back on very soon again. That was a stellar interview.”

And when you can't control the narrative, do a "cancel" on them. Truth hurts.

https://www.mediaite.com/tv/newsmax-...ling-that-lie/

[crazy]

Re: 2020 Vote Fraud Witnesses

Yea, just like all your dipshit comments.

Newsmax Host Ends Interview After Guest Destroys Newsmax For False Election Claims: ‘Are You Still Telling that Lie?’



And when you can't control the narrative, do a "cancel" on them. Truth hurts.

https://www.mediaite.com/tv/newsmax-...ling-that-lie/

Did you even read the story?? Guess not.. It does seem that the guest came on with an agenda.. But since it was an agenda that you evidently approve of it was all good.. you should follow all the news and not just your little hits as you find them.. But then again look at the highlighted headline.. Straight from a liberal rag that falls in line with your way of thinking.. Another great find there FX.. Give yourself a medal ..

[crazy]

Re: 2020 Vote Fraud Witnesses

They are idiots.

'It makes us look like idiots': Arizona state senator disowns widely criticized election recount after seeing it in action


Should all good repuklicans walk in lock step with their fuhrer ? Of course, that's evident here.

https://www.businessinsider.com/ariz...process-2021-5

[fxstc07]

Re: 2020 Vote Fraud Witnesses

What a bunch of clueless idiots you are. Hypocritical azzwipes.
Ban books and cancel culture. All tRump.

Trump’s Scary Lurch Into Book-Banning

But the cease-and-desist letter sent by Trump’s lawyer Charles Harder to Michael Wolff and to the publisher of Wolff’s soon-t0-be-released book Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House pretty clearly represents the same kind of attempted “prior restraint” of constitutionally protected speech that the Supreme Court condemned in the Pentagon Papers case and that American jurists have perpetually frowned upon.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018...k-banning.html

Trump’s efforts to block publication of books highlights concerns about prior restraint orders

So far this summer, President Trump and members of his family have made several attempts to prevent the publication of high-profile books offering an inside look at the president and his administration.

https://www.rcfp.org/rcfp-fights-pri...traint-orders/