President Donald Trump

[wizard]

Re: President Donald Trump

The whole world knows these are Bernie and Squad types.
There is no reaching necessary to see that.
These are today's "hippies". Not much love involved.
https://youtu.be/UJjLFnV3E7w

Sorry Slave,try harder,Project Veritas is nothing more than Right-Wing propaganda...what else you got?


https://www.snopes.com/news/2016/10/...ection-videos/

[slavenomore]

Re: President Donald Trump

Sorry Slave,try harder,Project Veritas is nothing more than Right-Wing propaganda...what else you got?


https://www.snopes.com/news/2016/10/...ection-videos/

The demands. Bernie stuff for sure....nithing about unions..only attacks on police who are union.
https://en.as.com/en/2020/06/14/othe...32_742209.html

Aside from the abolition or defunding of police, other demands associated with the Zone include rent control, the reversal of gentrification, a federal investigation into police brutality, funding of community health, reforms to education with an increased focus on black and Native American history, free college, the reallocation of funds from the Seattle Police Department to socialized health and medicine and free public housing.

[slavenomore]

Re: President Donald Trump

This is in there too.

CHAZ Charter demands
1. Abolition of the Seattle Police Department and attached court system. We do not request reform, we demand abolition. This means 100 per cent of funding, including existing pensions for Seattle Police. At an equal level of priority we also demand that the city disallow the operations of ICE [Immigration enforcement] in the city of Seattle

[fxstc07]

Re: President Donald Trump

We have wandered from the thread subject.
Posting of quoted material requires a link.

Fxstc07 - mod

Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk

[2631]

Re: President Donald Trump

The law and order side of me would have like to see the rioters and looters arrested, prosecuted, and jailed. But Trump's rhetoric about shooting them was pure B/S. He plays to his base and I don't always disagree with him. But it's all talk. He can't send in the Army and it's Cobras. It's my opinion that nobody without an agenda really supports defunding the police. I sure don't. If anything I say pay, train them better, and prosecute those few that do break the law.

[fedexnuno]

Re: President Donald Trump

I said let the protesters continue...But shoot the looters because they signify nothing for the purpose but to steal and harm owners!
Sorry I feel like this!
Thieves with intention to Harm others are scums !

[slavenomore]

Re: President Donald Trump

We have wandered from the thread subject.
Posting of quoted material requires a link.

Fxstc07 - mod

Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk

Which post needs link.
The one where CHAZ demands require that police and pensions and ICE be defunded and police lose their pensions? It is in the post above it.
http://teamstersonline.com/forums/sh...ad.php?t=81117

[fxstc07]

Re: President Donald Trump

Your link takes me to posts about anti union talk ... ???

But I did see your quote about CHAZ was in another post.

Before this thread drifts off in some other direction, I prefer we keep it to the subject title.

Chaz is an isolated incident in one city, which all revolves around the Floyd murder.
That would require its own thread to debate all that has led up to the turmoil rattling our country today.

Fxstc07 - mod



Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk

[slavenomore]

Re: President Donald Trump

Your link takes me to posts about anti union talk ... ???

But I did see your quote about CHAZ was in another post.

Before this thread drifts off in some other direction, I prefer we keep it to the subject title.

Chaz is an isolated incident in one city, which all revolves around the Floyd murder.
That would require its own thread to debate all that has led up to the turmoil rattling our country today.

Fxstc07 - mod



Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk

I was getting into the Trump Tulsa Rally where he stated about the situations it went into above. But ok. We will move on.

[2631]

Re: President Donald Trump

I said let the protesters continue...But shoot the looters because they signify nothing for the purpose but to steal and harm owners!
Sorry I feel like this!
Thieves with intention to Harm others are scums !

I'd like to agree with you. But if a cop shoots a looter running away with a TV he'll probably be fired and prosecuted. You can't just shoot unarmed looters even if Trump says so. Even under martial law they can't shoot unarmed looters. Now a business owner defending his property is a different situation.

[2631]

Re: President Donald Trump

Trumps back on it with the Tulsa Rally. Great speech. The Dems can't beat him. NeverTrump can't beat him.Biden sure as Hell can't beat him. Another 4 years on the way.
It would probably be a wiser move if our union supported him than supported all the loser stuff that comes with the ones we have supported on the left.
He is on the right track and the left is way off imo.

Apparently even Trump senior campaign staffers don't agree that last night's rally was a success. Up until the pandemic I thought Trump's reelection was a lock. But now I'm not so sure.

In the hours after the event, advisers and Republican strategists admitted the night was a flop and a missed opportunity to shift the momentum into Trump’s direction — and said it was unclear when there might be another rally. Still, they insisted there was plenty of time to recover from the images of a thinly-filled arena, headlines about infected aides, and a speech that failed to hit on the most pressing issues with voters.

“This was a bad night for our effort,” said one senior adviser. “Hardly a deal-breaker, lots of time to go, many miles ahead. But everything was awful tonight: crowd size, lack of focus in the speech, way too many riff stories.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/elect...kdf?li=BBnb7Kz

[slavenomore]

Re: President Donald Trump

Apparently even Trump senior campaign staffers don't agree that last night's rally was a success. Up until the pandemic I thought Trump's reelection was a lock. But now I'm not so sure.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/elect...kdf?li=BBnb7Kz

I don't think the numbers are so important for the rally. It's been 3 months of nothing being normal in public due to the virus. The campaign shouldn't worry so much about those numbers right now. The AntiTrump forces wanted nobody at the rally. Trump should claim victory and continue doing what he does. If the virus wasn't here it would have been a full house. No big deal to me.

If he loses we go right back to total corporate rule through the 2 parties. And the corporations set all rules. They will free trade us to collapse. They will continue the import of illegal aliens to bust unions and keep pay and standards low. And they will maybe try to make up for it with socialism. Both sides do it. And they take us to collapse. College won't fix it. Now we have automation coming to unemploy millions.
Trumps message is the only way to turn it around.
He is a line with the right message.
Both parties work for the corporations and the media does too.
Trumps is the way out. They are locked onto a track of self destruction.
The unions teamed with Trump would make great changes for the nation imo.
His trade stance is right for us.
His anticorporate donor stance is right for us.
His immigration stance is right for us.

His stance on the military in the world is right also. Imo.
Big savings if he was able to do all he wanted.
But he is against thousands of people in politics and media and everywhere who fight the change because they make money and power as it was. And it is too many to fight.
But he has put up the best fight I've ever seen politically.

[2631]

Re: President Donald Trump

More fake news from the NYT

Joseph R. Biden Jr. has taken a commanding lead over President Trump in the 2020 race, building a wide advantage among women and nonwhite voters and making deep inroads with some traditionally Republican-leaning groups that have shifted away from Mr. Trump following his ineffective response to the coronavirus pandemic, according to a new national poll of registered voters by The New York Times and Siena College.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/elect...5LL?li=BBnb7Kz

[slavenomore]

Re: President Donald Trump

More fake news from the NYT



https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/elect...5LL?li=BBnb7Kz

http://www.nytimes.com/newsgraphics/...ewsletter.html

The New York Times
Presidential Forecast
Tuesday, October 18, 2016

Hillary Clinton has a 91% chance to win →

[fxstc07]

Re: President Donald Trump

I could speak of the human rights issue alone. I could say the United States was always first to tell another country about their abuses of human rights. Yet we still subject many immigrants to the harsh reality of incarceration and placing children in cages after taking them from their parents. This is cruel and unwarranted, especially after this administration promised to stop the practice of removing children from their parents.

Family separation policy continues two years after Trump administration claims it ended

As public pressure quickly mounted against Trump’s “zero tolerance” policy to try to deter immigration, he signed an executive order on June 20, 2018 – two years ago this week – directing the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to stop separating families at the border, except in cases where there was concern that the parent might endanger the child. Six days later, U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw issued a nationwide injunction to halt family separations.

But since then, the practice has continued under the American public’s nose.

In many cases, the already-traumatized children were held in cages within locked warehouses. They slept under blankets resembling aluminum foil.
In other instances, children were shipped to live in tents or newly converted big box stores used as Border Patrol detention facilities. Grief-stricken, they overwhelmingly felt abandoned.
But separating families was nothing new under the Trump administration.

But it wasn’t until June 15, 2018, that DHS publicly acknowledged it had separated nearly 2,000 children from their parents or legal guardians between April 19 and May 31 of that year. This number – which did not account for the thousands separated prior to April 19 – would continue to rise.

That same month, the official government count of children separated from parents or guardians since 2017 was reported to be 4,368. By February, the administration had separated at least 1,142 additional children from parents at the border since the policy’s “end.” And by mid-May, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement began forcing parents and their children to separate, or risk being detained together indefinitely.
Two years after the executive order ending the family separation policy was signed and the injunction was issued, the message from the Trump administration is still the same: Migrant families don’t have the basic human right – or need – to stay together.

https://www.splcenter.org/news/2020/...F5IXGfO9hfKSV4