Coronavirus

[Docker]

Re: Coronavirus

The Next Step For The World Economic Forum

It has been obvious since early 2020 that there has been an organized cult outreach that has permeated the world as a whole. It’s possible that this formed out of a gigantic error, rooted in a sudden ignorance of cell biology and long experience of public health. It is also possible that a seasonal respiratory virus was deployed by some people as an opportunity to seize power for some other purpose.

Follow the money and influence trails and the latter conclusion is hard to dismiss.

The clues were there early. Even before the WHO declared a pandemic in March 2020 (at least several months behind the actual fact of a pandemic) and before any lockdowns, there were media blitzes talking about the “New Normal” and talk of the “Great Reset” (which was rebranded as “Build Back Better”). Pharmaceutical companies such as Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Moderna, and Astra-Zeneca were actively lobbying governments to buy their vaccines as early as February 2020, supposedly less than a month after the genetic sequence (or partial sequence) was made available by China. As a person who spent his whole professional career in pharmaceutical and vaccine development, I found the whole concept of going from scratch to a ready-to-use vaccine in a few months simply preposterous. Something did not add up. I knew of the names with which everyone has become familiar. Bill Gates, Neil Ferguson, Jeremy Farrar, Anthony Fauci, and others had either been lobbying for or pursuing the lockdown strategies for many years. But still, the scope of the actions seemed too large to even be explained by those names alone.

So, the fundamental questions that I have been asking myself have been why and who? The “Why” seems to always come back to issues besides public health. Of course the “Who” had the obvious players such as the WHO, China, CDC, NIH/NIAID, and various governments but there seemed to be more behind it than that. These players have been connected to the “public health” aspect but that seemed to be only scratching the surface. I am not an investigative journalist and I would never claim that role, but even I can do some simple internet searches and start to see patterns evolve. The searches that I have done have yielded some very interesting “coincidences.” If I give you the names of the following people – Biden, Trudeau, Ardern, Merkel, Macron, Draghi, Morrison, Xi Jinping – what do you think that they have in common? Yes, they are all pampered and stumble over themselves, but that is also not the connection.

One can see very quickly that these names certainly connect to lockdown countries and individuals who have ignored their own laws and/or tried in some way to usurp them. But, there is more to it than that and I will give a hint by providing a link with each name.

* Joseph Biden, President, United States

* Boris Johnson, PM of United Kingdom

* Jacinda Ardern, PM of New Zealand

* Angela Merkel, Former PM of Germany

* Emmanuel Macron, President of France

* Justin Trudeau, PM of Canada

* Xi Jinping, CCP Leader, China

* Mario Draghi, PM of Italy

* Scott Morrison, PM of Australia

They are all associated with the World Economic Forum (WEF), a “nonprofit” private organization started (in 1971) and headed by Klaus “You will own nothing and be happy” Schwab and his family. This is a private organization that has no official bearing with any world governance body, despite the implication of the name. It could just as well have been called the “Church of Schwabies.” The WEF was the origin of the “Great Reset” and I would guess that it was the origin of “Build Back Better” (since most of the above names have used that term recently). If you think that the WEF membership ends with just leaders of countries, here are a few more names:

* Gavin Newsom, Governor of California

* Jay Inslee, Governor of Washington State

* Anthony Fauci, Director NIAID

* Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House

Allow me to introduce more of the WEF by giving a list of names for the Board of Trustees.

* Al Gore, Former WP of the US

* Mark Caney, UN Special Envoy for Climate Action

* T. Shanmugaratnam, Seminar Minister Singapore

* Christine Lagarde, President, European Central Bank

* Ngozi Okonja-Iweala, Director General, WTO

* Kristalian Georggieva, Managing Director, IMF

* Chrystia Freeland, Deputy Minister of Canada

* Laurence Fink, CEO, BlackRock

You can see a cross section of political and economic leaders on the board. The leader of the organization, that is the leader of the Board, is still Klaus Schwab. He has built an impressive array of followers. If you want to really see the extent of influence, go to the website and pick out the corporate name of your choice; there are many to choose from: Abbott Laboratories, Astra-Zeneca, Biogen, Johnson & Johnson, Moderna, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Serum Institute of India, BASF, Mayo Clinic, Kaiser Permanente, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust, Blackrock, CISCO, Dell, Google, Huawei, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Zoom, Yahoo, Amazon, Airbus, Boeing, Honda, Rakuten, Walmart, UPS, Coca-Cola, UBER, Bank of China. Bank of America. Deutsche Bank, State Bank of India, Royal Bank of Canada, Lloyds Banking, JP Morgan-Chase, Equifax, Goldman-Sachs, Hong Kong Exchanges, Bloomberg, VISA, New York Times, Ontario (Canada) Teacher’s Pension Plan

The extent of reach is huge even beyond the worldwide leader network. For example, we all know what Bill Gates has been doing with his wealth via the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF). But, the Wellcome Trust is equal to the task. Who is the Director of the Wellcome Trust? One named Jeremy Farrar, of the United Kingdom SAGE and lockdown fame – arguably the architect of the US-UK lockdowns in 2020 – is closely associated with WEF. Concerning the reach that can occur, let me give some examples from the BMGF alone, and it comes from the time that I spent in 2020 reading their extensive funding list.

A few years ago, the BMGF awarded the Institute for Health Metric Evaluation (IHME) a ten-year, almost $280 million award. IHME (associated with the University of Washington in Seattle) was at the forefront of the computer modeling that was driving the lockdowns and the nonpharmaceutical Interventions during 2020. People have seen their name often in print or on MSNBC or CNN. In 2019, IHME awarded the Editor of the Lancet (Dr. Richard Horton) a $100,000 award and described him as an “activist editor.” The Lancet, once considered one of the best medical journals, has been at the forefront of censoring opposing scientific viewpoints since 2020 and publishing “papers” that were not fit to be published. I never could understand what it meant to be an “activist” editor in a respected scientific/medical journal because, stupid me, I always thought that the first job of the editor was to be impartial. I guess I learned in 2020 how wrong I was. Of course, the Lancet is also heavily funded from pharmaceutical companies such as Pfizer (also a member of the WEF).

More...

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitic...economic-forum

[Docker]

Re: Coronavirus

How Eisenhower Predicted Fauci

If it wasn't obvious before, the COVID-19 pandemic has shown that science has become thoroughly politicized. Though normally focused on observable and verifiable causes and effects in the natural world, many scientists, especially government employed ones, have taken on a political role and have shaped scientific findings in the service of those political ends. The truth eventually came out, but at a massive cost to people's mental health, finances and trust.

President Dwight Eisenhower foresaw this abuse by government scientists, and he shows us the way out. Public health officials initially insisted on the wet-market origin story for the novel coronavirus, but the lab-leak theory has become just as plausible. Cloth masks once deemed essential are now labeled "facial decorations." Schools have opened without becoming super spreaders. A John Hopkins University study recently concluded that lockdowns had a minuscule impact on virus morbidity. With all of these issues, some of the federal government's top scientists made a concerted effort to stifle debate. Dr. Francis Collins, the former head of the National Institutes of Health, requested a "devastating takedown" of those who disagreed with his insistence on lockdowns, referring to dissenting scholars from Harvard, Oxford and Stanford as "fringe." He and other public health officials selectively ignored real data. Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) and chief medical adviser to the president, declared that "attacks on me, quite frankly, are attacks on science." Collins' approach and Fauci's sentiment are exactly what President Eisenhower warned the American public about in his Farewell Address.

He advised vigilance against the "danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite." These "task forces of scientists," Eisenhower cautioned, would lead to the "domination of the nation's scholars."

One reason that so few infectious disease scientists disagreed with Fauci is quite simple: the power of money. America offers around $5 billion per year to support infectious disease research, and almost all of it runs through the agency led by Collins and Fauci. Any infectious disease researcher would therefore be disinclined to run afoul of Dr. Fauci, as future grant funding or professional advancement may depend on the director's approval. Grants like those from NIAID give the project a stamp of legitimacy and open the door to other supporters. This system offers Fauci monopoly-like power over infectious disease research. Research scientists then toe the line, or at least remain silent. This creates the appearance of unanimous agreement as, in Eisenhower's words, "a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity."

It is hard to prove intentional silence. But there are signs. When mask mandates were first introduced, for example, numerous virologists should have pointed to published RCT studies that cast doubt on masks' effectiveness in preventing transmission of airborne viruses. One May 2020 CDC paper "did not find evidence that surgical-type face masks are effective in reducing laboratory-confirmed influenza transmission, either when worn by infected persons (source control) or by persons in the general community to reduce their susceptibility." Likewise, the World Health Organization's 2019 program for an influenza pandemic does not recommend facemask use for the non-symptomatic or uninfected, and only recommends business and school closures in the most severe circumstances, even while acknowledging that these measures lack good evidence of effectiveness. This too was missing from COVID policy discussions. Ike correctly assessed that "the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop" is no longer the driving force behind scientific and technological progress. Research has become more "formalized, complex and costly." A 21st-century Benjamin Franklin can no longer purchase the expensive equipment or devote the time needed to make world-changing inventions or discoveries. Therefore, an "increasing share [of research] is conducted for, by or at the direction of the federal government." But it is still possible to steer clear of the dangers of politicized bias in science by maintaining the core of scientific inquiry: "intellectual curiosity." Intellectual curiosity is what enables us to figure out the truth of the reality that confronts us.

A pivot towards government research grants need not remove "the solitary inventor" from the picture. Those inventors may not be able to conduct the research on their own, but they can surely analyze the data. Government funded scientific data should always be open for scrutiny, because transparency enables the curious to understand the truth for themselves. Time and again, public officials attempted to force consensus over COVID. Government funded research that encourages competition and debate, rather than uniformity of thought, can help us figure out the truth. But Ike proposed a second, more important principle. To avoid the "domination of the nation's scholars" he declared that "it is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system-ever aiming toward the supreme goals of our free society." Scientists can tell us their best understanding of reality and its consequences, like the dangers of a new virus. But multifaceted decisions that affect people in different ways, such as closing schools or businesses, are not questions of science but judgements about the best way to navigate reality. That is the role of politicians elected by the people. While the scientist may be able to predict the consequences of some of our decisions, it is the statesman who must create policy that balances various needs, especially the tradeoff between freedom and safety. What should the quarantine policy be for COVID-exposed children in schools? Should hospital workers be obliged to get vaccinated? This requires a deliberative process, one best suited for legislative bodies.

Eisenhower issued two warnings in his Farewell Address: "the acquisition of unwarranted influence...by the military-industrial complex" and "that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite." The aimless wars in Afghanistan and Iraq demonstrated the danger of the former, while the coronavirus pandemic has forced us to witness the latter. Ike was prescient. We cannot return to a bygone era and dismantle these systems, but we can be more aware of the forces at play and be wiser. The current pushback against American engagement in Ukraine is more forceful than the leadup to the Iraq conflict because we saw the experts mislead us and fail. The next time a scientific scare comes rolling around, we must passionately seek truth and demand that our elected leaders courageously represent the people.

https://youtu.be/OyBNmecVtdU



https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...redicted-fauci

[Docker]

Re: Coronavirus

[Docker]

Re: Coronavirus

“Greatest Fraud in History”: Doctors Sue Federal Government Over COVID Vax

America’s Frontline Doctors, a group of medical professionals who work to promote early COVID-19 treatments and to expose the influence of pharmaceutical companies on federal decision-making, is suing the U.S. government over the COVID vaccination campaign. The latter is called by the plaintiffs “the greatest fraud in the history of the world.” The suit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama on February 16 includes a comprehensive amount of evidence regarding such pressing issues as serious side effects linked to COVID vaccinations recorded in the U.S. military and COVID vaccines’ ineffectiveness in preventing infection and protecting one from severe disease, as shown in the breakthrough infections records of Medicare patients.

The lawsuit alleges that the federal government — and particularly the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which is ostensibly responsible for protecting public health by ensuring the safety, efficacy, and security of medical products — was aware of these issues yet intentionally withheld them from the public.The suit was filed by Ohio-based attorney Thomas Renz, who posted a “Special Notice Regarding Critical Evidence Related to COVID-19, Potential Governmental Corruption, and the Safety of Our Military and Citizens” on his website. The document provides bullet-point information on each allegation made in the lawsuit, and is intended to be shared with lawmakers, governors, state attorneys general, “and as many other elected officials as possible throughout the nation.” The notice reads,

For approximately two years now, two presidents, congress, the federal and state court systems, and the American public have been lied to, manipulated, and injured. What started as one of the most egregious over-reaches of executive power in American history — 14 days to flatten the curve — quickly morphed into an anathema to the principles upon which our republic was founded. These lies and manipulation have resulted in an economic crisis, a mental health crisis, the erosion of freedoms fundamental to all Americans, and the debilitation of our military.

While Renz underlines that his clients do not deny COVID-19’s existence, he states that non-establishment doctors have accumulated enough evidence to prove the “combination of unelected and totally corrupt bureaucrats, big tech and big pharma billionaires, the mainstream media, and the healthcare/pharmaceutical industry have successfully perpetrated the greatest fraud in the history of the world.” That was achieved through such methods as “data manipulation, terrible public health policy, and political manipulation that made a disease with approximately the same case fatality rate as the seasonal flu in most people appear to be the end of the world.”

The notice focuses on the damage that COVID vaccines have done to U.S. troops who have been vaccinated since late March 2020. The shots were mandated for the military in August 2021, and all non-compliant servicemen have been threatened with discharge. As of today, as stated by Renz, the U.S. military might become weaker by a quarter, since 25 percent of all servicemen have refused the shot.

More...

https://thenewamerican.com/greatest-...ver-covid-vax/

[strapdrager]

Re: Coronavirus

Sure it was all a scam.
Peoples lives were destroyed.
Family business destroyed
Out right Unconstitutional for sure.
Yet many simply fell in line. Running out in fear getting vaccinated
The vaccine never worked.
The virus continued vaccinated or not.
You had a 98.9 percent you be fine but most ran in fear.....BUT

It will return and used against you. You won't even know if it's just the common Flu.
But come election time all tools will be used against you..

[crazy]

Re: Coronavirus

Deaths represent 1.3% of side effects reported for COVID vaccines: peer-reviewed CDC study

Vaccine experts are skeptical of agency's reliance on Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, however. Study's time period excludes nearly all minors.

Deaths following mRNA vaccination against COVID-19 represented 13 out of every 1,000 reports (1.3%) to the federal government's Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), the CDC's Atlanta-based researchers said Monday.
Another 66 reports out of every 1,000 (6.6%) were categorized as "serious," resulting in "inpatient hospitalisation, prolongation of hospitalisation, permanent disability, life-threatening illness, congenital anomaly or birth defect," according to their study published in The Lancet, the U.K-based medical journal.

VAERS is often dubbed a passive surveillance system because it accepts reports from anyone. The CDC previously told Just the News that most reports come from manufacturers or healthcare providers, who have mandatory reporting requirements.

But the researchers said they also consulted an "active" smartphone-based voluntary monitoring system, v-safe, created in 2020. The data show that "most reported adverse events were mild and short in duration," with 18-49 year-olds representing a plurality (45%) and females a supermajority (75%).

Mainstream media uncritically ran with the CDC's framing, with USA Today touting researcher David Shay's assurance that the death rate was expected given the elderly population studied. About a quarter of reports were from ages 65 and up.

A large subset of young people was almost entirely excluded, however: minors.

The study only reviewed the first six months of emergency use authorization (EUA) for the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, covering 340,000 reports and 299 million doses.

That time period ends just a month after Pfizer's vaccine was authorized for 12-15 year-olds and predates its EUA for children 5-11, while Moderna's vaccine remains unauthorized for anyone under 18. The study's youngest age range is 16-17, representing 2% of all reports.

"Why the cut-off at six months? There are now data that extend for 14 months, and those data include children," Robert Malone, the mRNA vaccine pioneer-turned-critic, wrote in his newsletter.

Health authorities worldwide have recognized young people, particularly males, as having a higher risk for heart inflammation following mRNA vaccination, especially after the second dose. That was the FDA's rationale to indefinitely pause consideration of Moderna's vaccine for adolescents.

Malone also faulted the CDC researchers' prior literature search of the National Institutes of Health's PubMed database. Their search methodology was so complicated that it returned few papers describing post-vaccination health impacts, in contrast to Malone's much longer list of relevant papers through January.

Mainstream vaccine scientists who have questioned the feds' COVID vaccine strategy, particularly boosters-for-all and refusal to recognize natural immunity, had a different critique of the study than Malone.

"From the report of these VAERS data, one can neither conclude that the vaccine is safe or that it is not safe," epidemiologist Martin Kulldorff, formerly of Harvard Medical School, told Just the News.

"From the v-safe survey, we can conclude that mild adverse reactions are very common, and more common than for most vaccines, but we already knew that from the randomized clinical trials," the Great Barrington Declaration coauthor wrote in an email. "We cannot conclude much about serious adverse events."

He gave the hypothetical example of three vaccines that each have 1,000 reported deaths. The first and second each have a million administered doses, but because the second has far fewer mild adverse events, it actually has a higher percentage of deaths among adverse events. The third, with only 10,000 administered doses, is actually the most dangerous but has the same percentage of deaths among adverse events as the second.

The CDC kicked Kulldorff off a vaccine safety panel last year for publicly questioning its recommendation for an across-the-board pause in distribution of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine based on blood-clot reports in prime-age women. It adopted his view days later.

"I think you can really make nothing of VAERS data," Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and member of the FDA's Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, told Just the News in a phone call.

"I think you can really make nothing of VAERS data," Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and member of the FDA's Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, told Just the News in a phone call.

He doesn't understand why the CDC "bend[s] over backwards to validate" what he calls a "noisy system" that would be better described as a "hypothesis-generation mechanism." While VAERS picked up intestinal blockage reports from a rotavirus vaccine and myocarditis reports from mRNA vaccines, it was the public-private Vaccine Safety Datalink that confirmed both, Offit said.

While he couldn't explain the narrow time period studied, Offit said he doubts "the CDC is trying to lie to you." He raised eyebrows in recent months by arguing against third mRNA doses for young people, including his son, and casually discussing his participation in a federal meeting on whether to recognize natural immunity in pending vaccine mandates.

A Columbia University researcher who estimates COVID vaccine-related deaths are "underreported by a factor of 20" told Just the News he wasn't surprised by the high incidence of serious events, including death, among the adverse events reported through VAERS.

"I would expect severe events would be more likely to be reported to VAERS," clinical neurobiologist Spiro Pantazatos wrote in an email, while cautioning that COVID vaccines should be compared to "the distribution of event types for other vaccines."

What surprised him in The Lancet study: The CDC researchers didn't use "rigorous and quantitative cost-benefit analysis" to reach their conclusion that the "benefits of immunization favor vaccination."

Neither the CDC nor the study's corresponding author, Julianne Gee, responded to Just the News queries about the study's characterization of adverse events or limitation to the first six months of the vaccines' EUA.

https://justthenews.com/government/f...-peer-reviewed

[crazy]

Republicans expose 'uncommon' CDC, teachers' union ties on COVID school reopening guidance in report

Republicans accuse Walensky of downplaying the degree to which the CDC departed from past practice to allow AFT to affect the policymaking process

EXCLUSIVE: Republican lawmakers who sit on the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis are releasing a report Wednesday revealing a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) official’s testimony claiming that the agency coordinated with teachers' unions at an extraordinary level in crafting its school reopening guidance, despite the agency’s earlier claims that such coordination was routine and nonpolitical.

In the interim report, exclusively reviewed by Fox News Digital, Republicans wrote that emails between the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), the White House, and the CDC showed that the AFT’s "cozy relationship with the Biden administration’s political leadership at the CDC positioned the union to impose line-by-line edits" to the reopening guidance, despite the CDC’s "past practice to keep draft guidance confidential."

Fox News previously reported in October on emails that showed the AFT and the National Education Association, the two largest teachers' unions in the U.S., received a copy of the guidance before the CDC released it to the public.

TEACHERS UNION INFLUENCED LAST-MINUTE CDC SCHOOL GUIDANCE RECEIVED COPIES BEFORE PUBLIC RELEASE, EMAILS SHOW

On Feb. 11, 2021 one day before the CDC publicly posted the guidance, AFT's senior director of health issues, Kelly Trautner, emailed CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky asking her to insert the line: "In the event high-community transmission results from a new variant of SARS-CoV-2, a new update of these guidelines may be necessary."
The emails revealed that Walensky forwarded the email to Dr. Henry Walke, director of the CDC’s Center for Preparedness and Response, who then revised the guidance in accordance with AFT’s request.

The emails also revealed that CDC officials coordinated an early release of the final guidance to the AFT before releasing it to the public.

The Republicans’ report Wednesday says the Biden administration provided the teachers' unions "unprecedented access to the policymaking process for guidance on re-opening schools."

"Documents and testimony show, however, that Director Walensky downplayed the degree to which CDC departed from past practice to allow AFT to affect the policymaking process. In fact, CDC allowed AFT to insert language into the Operational Guidance that made it more likely schools across the country would remain closed after February 2021," says the report.

The report features new testimony from Walke in a Feb. 18, 2022 interview, saying the level with which the CDC coordinated with the teachers unions was "uncommon," and that the CDC does not typically share draft guidance outside the agency.
The report states the Biden administration’s lawyers would not allow Walke to answer questions pertaining to why the CDC allowed this level of coordination with the teachers' unions.

"When Republican staff asked Dr. Walke questions to that effect, a Biden Administration lawyer instructed him not to answer," says the report. "Because lawyers for the Biden Administration prevented a key witness from explaining why the CDC allowed AFT to write key portions of its guidance for re-opening schools, there are still several unanswered questions. This matter should be investigated further."

The AFT’s edits were intended to make it more likely that schools would close to in-person learning, according to the Republicans' findings.

CDC TIGHTENED MASKING GUIDELINES AFTER THREATS FROM TEACHERS UNIONS, EMAILS SHOW

In a joint statement provided exclusively to Fox News Digital, Republican Reps. Steve Scalise and James Comer accused President Biden of rewarding one of his biggest political donors while millions of children suffered from school closures.

"The facts are clear: Biden’s CDC overrode routine practice to allow a radical teachers union that donated millions of dollars to Democrat campaigns to bypass scientific norms and rewrite official agency guidance," Scalise and Comer wrote.

"The damaging edits by union bosses effectively kept thousands of schools shuttered across the country, locking millions of children out of their classrooms. The Biden Administration abandoned medical science and replaced it with political science to reward one of their largest donors, harming millions of children in the process. They bypassed the science to put union bosses ahead of children.
"Millions of Americans are still outraged at what these Washington Democrats put their children through, and all because union bosses demanded they keep schools closed longer," they continued.

"America’s children are suffering, academically and mentally, because of the Biden Administration enabled school closures. Republicans will not rest until we uncover all the facts and hold everyone accountable who was involved in holding back millions of children from having equal opportunity to achieve the American Dream."
The CDC previously defended its conversations with the unions as routine, saying, "As part of long-standing best practices, CDC has traditionally engaged with organizations and groups that are impacted by guidance and recommendations issued by the agency.

At the time of the guidance's release, Walensky reportedly said it was "free from political meddling."


The AFT also previously defended its role in shaping federal policy, saying, "we have been in regular touch with the agencies setting policy" that affect its 1.7 million members.

In response for a request for comment, an AFT spokesperson told Fox News Digital that the CDC also worked with dozens of other groups and organizations in crafting the guidance.

The CDC did not respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment on the Republicans' report.


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rep...ening-guidance

[Docker]

‘I’ve Been Grounded’: Six Marine Pilots Speak Out Against COVID Vaccine Mandate

Six active duty Marines are speaking out against the Biden administration’s coronavirus vaccine mandate in a video that was aired during an anti-vaccine-mandate rally in Los Angeles on Sunday. The video marks one of the most public displays by active duty service members of opposition to the mandate, which was ordered by Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin last August. In the video, the six pilots — including the first female Marine F-35C pilot — speak about the effect their opposition to the mandate has had on their lives. They all face discharge from the military, the loss of benefits, or have faced some punitive measures.

Marine Lt. Col. Scott Duncan, a former Top Gun instructor and F-35 pilot, begins the video saying he was competitively selected to command an F-35 squadron, but that was rescinded due to his opposition to the vaccine mandate. “I was competitively selected to command an F-35 squadron. That achievement took 18 years and seven months and was recently taken away because my religious accommodation and appeal both came back denied,” he said.

Marine Capt. Joshua Hoppe, an MV-22 Osprey pilot with just over nine years of service, said that if the mandate is not rescinded, “I will likely be removed from service, charged with misconduct, and the educational benefits that I’ve transferred to my children will be removed.” “This mandate infringes on our religious freedoms and is being unlawfully enforced. I have sworn an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic. I will not abandon that oath,” Hoppe said.

Marine Capt. Nick Morrison, active duty Marine F-35 pilot with just under six years of service, said he is facing discharge after his religious accommodation request was denied. “Absent intervention from our judicial branch or our senior military leadership, I face involuntary separation from our beloved corps after my religious accommodation request was wrongfully denied. These injustices being carried against an officer are likely occurring at even greater scale to our junior Marines. When we took the voluntary oath of service, we did not surrender our constitutional right to exercise religious freedom,” he said.

Marine Capt. Catherine Stark, the Marine Corps’ first female F-35C Lightning II pilot, said in the video, “This past year, the policies in place have led to me being personally targeted and discriminated against. I pray to my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ that the military can reverse the mandate and respect my religious and moral beliefs as well as my legitimate health concerns.”

Marine Lt. Col. Jonathan Reed, a Top Gun graduate and an F-18 pilot who has served for 18 years and 5 months, including five deployments, said he has been removed from senior positions within his units as he awaits a decision on his appeal of his religious accommodation denial. “Resulting from our quest for religious accommodation from Covid vaccines, I’ve been removed from senior positions within my units and I am awaiting final adjudication of my religious accommodation appeal,” he said. “Like thousands of other military service members, I face likely administrative separation from service. I stand here with you, and with thousands of other service members, at great risk in the aggressive defense of our Constitution and of our religious beliefs,” he said.

Marine Lt. Col. Hank Hortenstine, who primarily served as an instructor pilot for multiple helicopters and fixed wing aircraft with three combat deployments, said he has been grounded for not wanting to take the vaccine. “Now I’ve been grounded and I’m being processed for punitive discharge because of my religious and conscientious objection to the shot mandate,” he said. “These stories you’ve heard today are ours. However, it bears repeating that we stand today for tens of thousands of service members in similar circumstances or even worse. Over 1,000 have already been punitively discharged under similar grounds. We stand today for truth, religious liberty, and in fulfillment of the oath that we took to support and defend the Constitution.”

More than 1,500 Marines have been discharged, as well as approximately 100 soldiers, approximately 250 airmen, and approximately 800 sailors, over the vaccine mandate so far. Thousands more are expected to be discharged, including many who applied for religious accommodation but were denied. So far, several dozen have been approved, but the circumstances around those approvals are unclear. Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) received confirmation that at least several of those who have had requests approved were already in the process of leaving the military, as Breitbart News reported in February.


https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...ccine-mandate/

[strapdrager]

A must watch.........




https://rumble.com/v10n7q3-world-pre...ll-movie..html

[crazy]

1 Million COVID Deaths: Here’s The Real Reason Why More People Died From COVID In The United States Than Every Other Country

After two years of inundating the public with propaganda and fear surrounding COVID-19, the mainstream media and the federal government turned the page on the manufactured pandemic.

While coronavirus fades from headlines, the number of people purportedly dying from the virus continues to climb.

Over one million Americans have now purportedly died from COVID-19, according to figures published by Our World In Data.
Read more

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...every-country/

[crazy]

Out with the coronavirus and in with the monkey pox Just in time for the midterm elections

[strapdrager]

https://youtu.be/1MFGZ9BPGPU

[strapdrager]

[video=youtube_share;1MFGZ9BPGPU]https://youtu.be/1MFGZ9BPGPU[/video] 

[crazy]

Wait what?? And Fauci says we all need to be vaccinated before going to have Thanksgiving dinner with family.. What a joke that guy is..

WaPo: The Vaccinated Now Account for a Majority of COVID Deaths

“a majority of Americans dying from the coronavirus received at least the primary series of the vaccine.”

The latest data shows that 58% of COVID-19 deaths in August 2022 were from people who were vaccinated or boosted. Based on past figures and the current trends, we can reasonably estimate that the number of vaccinated/boosted COVID-19 deaths will only rise. (In September 2021, the vaccinated accounted for 23% of COVID-19 deaths; in January/February 2022, the vaccinated were 42%.)

This is what happens when you rush ineffective and dangerous vaccines.

The FDA’s promises of efficacy – 91% for the Pfizer vaccine and 93% for the Moderna vaccine – were always based on hope, not data. So too were the promises of safety. At the time of the official approvals, both Pfizer and Moderna hadn’t submitted any type of long-term numbers on effectiveness. Their trials were polluted with the unblinding of participants and their safety studies are “ongoing.”

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...-covid-deaths/

[crazy]

Scientist from Wuhan says Covid ‘leaked from lab' and he was 'terrified by what he saw'

Awhistleblower who worked in Wuhan has repeated claims Covid-19 leaked from a Chinese laboratory. The Wuhan Institute of Virology, a high security lab specialising in coronaviruses, has long been tipped by some as the origin point of the pandemic, which killed 6,646,172 worldwide. Both China and the lab have furiously denied any allegations, but nearly three years removed from the first case of Covid-19, a whistleblower has claimed it all started from a leak.

Loaded: 34.48%
Pause
Current Time 0:24
/
Duration 3:46
HQ
Fullscreen
SNL Cold Open: Herschel Walker Sits Down With Mitch McConnell
Unmute
0
View on Watch
Dr Andrew Huff, former vice president of EcoHealth Alliance, claims in his book 'The Truth About Wuhan' the Covid-19 pandemic was the result of the US government's funding of dangerous genetic engineering of coronaviruses in China.

Dr Huff said the EcoHealth Alliance taught the Wuhan lab the "best existing methods to engineer bat coronaviruses to attack other species".

The army veteran, from Michigan, claimed "China knew from day one that this was a genetically engineered agent".

"The US government is to blame for the transfer of dangerous biotechnology to the Chinese," Dr Huff added.

"I was terrified by what I saw. We were just handing them bioweapon technology."

A whistleblower has repeated claims Covid-19 leaked from a Chinese lab© GETTY

The Wuhan Institute of Virology has been tipped as the origin of the virus, which China denies© GETTY

Speaking to The Sun, the whistleblower claimed EcoHealth Alliance had been studying different coronaviruses in bats for more than ten years with funding from the National Institutes of Health, and developed close working ties with the Wuhan lab.





































Continue reading

Scientist from Wuhan says Covid ‘leaked from lab' and he was 'terrified by what he saw' (msn.com)